Benchmarking noise policies

Présentation au sujet: "Benchmarking noise policies"— Transcription de la présentation:

1 Benchmarking noise policies
Brussels, 20 nov. 2015 Pascal Garreau, Arcandia Consulting

2 The issue: Noise, a paradox?
Source: Aéroports de Montréal

3 The issue: A solution must be found
« Aircraft noise is often the main obstruction to obtaining permission to grow » Angela Gittens, Director General, ACI World, ICAO Air Transport Sympasium, 18 April 2012

4 Overview of the tools : The « balanced approach »
Texte Reduction of noise at source Land use planning and management Significant noise reductions thanks to new technologies New ICAO noise standards (Ch.4) have recently come into operation Planning (zoning, easement,etc.) Mitigation (building codes, insulation) Noise abatement procedures Operating restrictions Noise preferential routes/runways Displaced thresholds SID and RNAV procedures Reduced power/drag and CDO Limited engine ground running NB: Not to be used as a first resort, only after consideration of benefits gained from other 3 elements Movement caps Noise quotas Curfews

5 The set of tools we have analysed
Noise monitoring, Information and Mediation Land use planning and management Abatement operational procedures Operating restrictions Market-based measures Noise monitoring and information systems Monitoring networks Information tools Negociation bodies Land use planning and management Noise abatement operational procedures Operating restrictions Market-based measures Noise related charges Fines

6 Our set of airports Hubs or O.- D. Business or Leasure
City or outskirts PAX or Cargo One rnw of Several Size (in 2013 PAX): > 50M 25 – 50M < 25M

7 Methodological disclaimer
We used publicly available information The information gathered are « rough » and could be incomplete We tried to simplify a complex reality But, the Devil is hidden in the details We used pubic available info The info gathered are ruth, we tried to simplify a complex reality tthe Devil is in the details, …) 2 main conclusions : there are the tools we implement, but the must import is the way we implement them It is not usefull to compare tool by tool, but we should understand that noise management is a global policy (a system), with priorities and hierarchy linked to the specific contexte of an airport, is business model and is market power

8 Analysis of the results (1/5)

9 Analysis of the results (2/5)

10 Analysis of the results (3/5)

11 Analysis of the results (4/5)

12 Analysis of the results (5/5)
The « must have » tools The « average » tools The « rare » tools

13 A system ? Noise management is a “system”
We used pubic available info The info gathered are ruth, we tried to simplify a complex reality tthe Devil is in the details, …) Gathering various tools which are interconnected Establishing priorities Is related to a context (specific constraints, opportunities, etc.)

14 Noise management is a “system”
ATTENTION : les outils ne sont pas pondérés entre eux (et, en fonction des cas, un outil peut résoudre le problème…) CDG : approche généraliste LHR : approche spécialisée (pas de possibilité de limiter construction) Mais, deux hubs, nécessité de rester ouvert aux plages de hubs (faudrait analyser véritable impact business des fermeture la nuit en fonction des types de trafic… LHR a des vols qui viennent d’Australie, pas CDG…)

15 Noise management is a “system”
ATTENTION : les outils ne sont pas pondérés entre eux (et, en fonction des cas, un outil peut résoudre le problème…) CDG : approche généraliste LHR : approche spécialisée (pas de possibilité de limiter construction) Mais, deux hubs, nécessité de rester ouvert aux plages de hubs (faudrait analyser véritable impact business des fermeture la nuit en fonction des types de trafic… LHR a des vols qui viennent d’Australie, pas CDG…)

16