Télécharger la présentation
La présentation est en train de télécharger. S'il vous plaît, attendez
Publié parali fadi Modifié depuis plus de 5 années
2
NACE International East Asia Pacific Rim Area Conference & Expo 2014 September 2 – 4, 2014 Nusa Dua Convention Center Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia Evaluation on the Cathodic Protection Inspection Methods for Underground Pipeline Paper No : P - 14 Ari Kurniawan – PT. KPM Oil and Gas – www.kpmog.com Aditya F. Arif– PT. Rekayasa Industri– www.rekayasa.com Saturday, May 11, 2019 2014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo
3
Outline Background Methods Results and Discussion Summary References 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo2
4
Background Cathodic Protection (CP) combined with coating are still the best method to prevent external corrosion CP requires routine inspection as specify in Standard and Code Some pipe owner does not perform inspection due to lack of knowledge or budget Case Study for 16 inch aged gas pipeline 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo3
5
Background – Case Study Pipeline Length : 9 km OD/WT: NPS 16 inch/9.53 mm CP System: SACP every 300-600 m Coating: Coaltar Enamel Age: > 10 years Condition: Pararel with 2 foreign pipeline with ICCP Current Inspection : p/s potential measurement only – pipeline was protected Improvement method : CIPS, PCM, DCVG, ACVG 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo4
6
Background – Case Study P/S Potential Measurement last 3 month 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo5 TP No Chainage (m) Potensial Measurement vs CSE ( -mV) Remark Month 1Month 2Month 3 10770780791Unprotected 2200980975981Protected 3627850859862Protected 4967852857863Protected 51373860851870Protected 62066942920953Protected 72334973961980Protected 826259819621005Protected 92908862849856Protected 103393851860854Protected 113920941930940Protected 12416810129891002Protected 134466870850852Protected 144708849842845Less Protected 155071851847862Protected 165257923910926Protected 175944960951963Protected 186128810820816Less Protected 196355849850853Protected 206647812823810Less Protected 216882750740745Unprotected 227132853851860Protected 237368849839851Protected 247561930921935Protected 258432850851863Protected 269040800820832Less Protected
7
Methods Close Interval Potential Survey (CIPS) Pipeline Current Mapper (PCM) Direct Current Voltage Gradient (DCVG) BellHole/Direct Examination 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo6
8
Picture source : Peabody’s Control of Pipeline Corrosion, Methods CIPS (Close Interval Potential Survey )
9
P/s Potensial (-mV) - 850 mV Chainage (m) TP 1TP 2 - 1000 mV - 950 mV Methods CIPS (Close Interval Potential Survey )
10
Continous potential measurement method Measurement interval 1-3 meter Use trailing wire and data logger To check CP Protection level along pipeline Methods CIPS (Close Interval Potential Survey ) Picture source : CP2 – Cathodic Protection Technician Course Manual
11
Measure Current Attenuation along pipeline Indicate Pipe anomaly (Coating defect, metal contact, etc) Picture source : Pipeline Current Mapper User Guide by Radiodetection Methods PCM (Pipeline Current Mapper)
12
Normal Current DistributionAnomaly Current Distribution Picture source : Pipeline Current Mapper User Guide Methods PCM (Pipeline Current Mapper)
13
Indicate Coating defect/anomaly by measure DC Voltage Gradient Perform along pipeline Not Indicate CP Protection Level Could calculate qualitative Coating Defect (%IR) Picture source : Personal file Methods DCVG (Direct Current Voltage Gradient)
14
No % IRClassification 10-15%No repair required 215-35%Recommended to repair 335-60%Worthed to repair 460-100%Immediate repair 13 Picture source : Method Statement of DCVG by DCVG Technology Ltd Classification of Coating Defect Based on % IR Methods DCVG (Direct Current Voltage Gradient)
15
Methods ACVG (Alternate Current Voltage Gradient) Indicate Coating defect/anomaly by measure AC Voltage Gradient Performed along pipeline Does not Indicate CP Protection Level Could be used in concrete and asphalt Picture source : Pipeline Current Mapper User Guide
16
Methods ACVG (Alternate Current Voltage Gradient)
17
Carried out at indicated location Perform visual observation Potential measurement Wall thickness measurement CD repair Picture source : Personal file Methods Bellhole – Direct Examination
18
Results and Discussion Cathodic Protection Level 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo17 CIPS survey result at segment chainage 0 – 4500, first segment
19
Results and Discussion Cathodic Protection Level 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo18 CIPS survey result at segment chainage 4500-9200, second segment
20
Results and Discussion Cathodic Protection Level 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo19 CIPS survey result at segment chainage 0 - 700 Current Pick Up Current Discharge
21
Results and Discussion Cathodic Protection Level 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo20 Protection level achieved only at test point Indication of stray current at chainge 200-400 and 400-600 Stray current come from other CP System (ICCP)
22
Results and Discussion Coating Integrity Survey 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo21 Result of PCM, ACVG and DCVG surveys segment KM 0-4500, first segment
23
Results and Discussion Coating Integrity Survey 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo22 Result of PCM, ACVG and DCVG surveys segment KM 4500-9000, second segment
24
Results and Discussion Coating Integrity Survey 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo23 Result of PCM, ACVG and DCVG surveys segment KM 0-4500, first segment CD No Chainage (m) Indirect Inspection Result Digging Validation Result PCM DCVG (%IR) ACVG (dB) CIPS Coating Condition Pipe Condition P/S Potensial (-mV) 1381Yes1934UYesCD FoundGC630 2559-11-UYesCD FoundPT610 31368Yes--U Good 742 44031-4,93-PYesCD FoundGC865 54094--27P No --- 65488--32U No --- 75806Yes-30UYesCD FoundGC719 86145-- 21 U No -- - 96198-- 35 U No -- - 107405Yes-37UYesCD FoundGC731 118038-2,39-U No --- 128075Yes8,2840UYesCD FoundGC678 138138-4,81-UYesCD FoundGC695 148982Yes1526UYesCD FoundPT642 Note U : Unprotected, P : Protected, GC : General Corrosion, PT : Pitting
25
Results and Discussion Coating Integrity Survey 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo24 CD found at chainage 4031CD found at chainage 8075
26
Results and Discussion Coating Integrity Survey 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo25 Pitting found at chainage 559
27
Summary P/s potential measurement at certain sampling points is only able to give a figure on the CP level at the sampling points and hence inadequate for aged pipeline with possible interference with other CP system. Combination of CIPS, PCM, DCVG and ACVG is an effective method to determine coating integrity and CP effectiveness. It is highly recommended to apply a combination of CIPS, PCM, DCVG and ACVG surveys in a mandatory basis instead of supplementary. 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo26
28
References A.W. Peabody, Ronald. L. Bianchetti, Peabody’s Control of Pipeline Corrosion, 2 nd ed. (Houston, TX: NACE, 2001) W.Von. Beckmann, et al, Handbook of Cathodic Corrosion Protection Theory and Practies of Electrochemical Protection Processess, 3 rd ed. (Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing, 1997) NACE SP0169-2007, “Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping System” (Houston, TX: NACE) NACE International, CP2 – Cathodic Protection Technician Course Manual, (Houston, TX: NACE, 2008) : p 6:24 P. Nicholson, “External Corrosion Direct Assessment”, NACE CORCON INDIA 2004, (New Delhi, India: NACE India Section- Corrosion Society of India, December 2-4 2004) NACE SP0502-2008, “External Corrosion Direct Assessment” ” (Houston, TX: NACE) 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo27
29
THANK YOU Acknowledgments PT. KPM Oil and Gas Board of Director 5/11/20192014 NACE EAP Conference & Expo28
Présentations similaires
© 2024 SlidePlayer.fr Inc.
All rights reserved.