Télécharger la présentation
La présentation est en train de télécharger. S'il vous plaît, attendez
Publié parMarie Lachapelle Modifié depuis plus de 9 années
1
Fabien Plassard December 4 th European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 ILC BDS MEETING Optics Design and Beam Dynamics Modeling Status Polytechnic Institute of Applied Sciences (IPSA), Paris CERN, Switzerland
2
slide 2/14 OUTLINE 1 1 Objectives and FFS design strategy A A B B C C A A B B Summary of the optics optimization and performances Tuning status: BBA optimization Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire Lattices designed Beam sizes and bandwidth Magnetic peak field European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 A A B B Engineering constraints Further studies and simulations Summary and Conclusions 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5
3
slide 3/14 Objectives and FFS design strategy Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions Small FD magnets vibration Same magnets for all the detectors Final Focus design based on the traditional scheme with dedicated chromatic correction sections Goal : Check the feasibility in terms of luminosity and tuning performances common L* for both SiD and ILD
4
slide 4/14 Summary of the optics optimization and performances Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire A A 2 2 1 1 3 3 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions Original traditional design New traditonal using 8 extra sextupoles 498.16.461.360.84 Current performances : (∆p/p = 0.125%)
5
slide 5/14 Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire B B 3 3 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 2 2 1 1 Previous status of the tuning study for the new design: No significant improvement after iterations DFS weights must be optimized
6
slide 6/14 Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire B B 3 3 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 2 2 1 1 Several weights combinaisons were performed for 40 seeds each
7
slide 7/14 Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire B B 3 3 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 2 2 1 1 Tuning performance after weights optimization: Optimization of the DFS weights improve the alignment process especially for the DFS2
8
slide 8/14 Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire A A 2 2 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 3 3 1 1 A last drift of 7 meters is a possible option to remove the FD from the detector area Lattice for D1 = L* = 7 m Lattice for D1 = 1.5 m
9
slide 9/14 Beam sizes and bandwidth Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire B B 2 2 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 3 3 1 1 Considering higher order aberrations the deviation is very small in vertical plane (4% and 5% for extra sextupoles lattice D1 = 1.5 m and D1 = 7 m respectively) Considering higher order aberrations the deviation is very small in horizontal plane (4% and 3% for extra sextupoles lattice D1 = 1.5 m and D1 = 7 m respectively)
10
slide 10/14 Beam sizes and bandwidth Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire B B 2 2 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 3 3 1 1
11
slide 11/14 Magnetic peak field checking Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire C C 2 2 4 4 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 3 3 1 1 Due to the short length of this traditional scheme the two last quadrupoles show high magnetic field (2 Tesla) to match the β-functions in CCX and CCY QF1 and QD0 show a high magnetic field for the current lattice and should be reduce in further optimization according to the technology available
12
slide 12/14 Engineering constraints Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire A A 2 2 3 3 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 4 4 1 1 Find optimum position, length and strength of the Final Doublet QF1 and QD0 to increase luminosity and bandwidth, reduced tolerences, simpler tuning and wider collimation depth Consider the ILC tunnel according to this alternate FFS design
13
slide 13/14 Further studies and simulations Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire B B 2 2 3 3 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 5 5 Conclusions 4 4 1 1 Optimize bending magnet strenght, according to the ILC tunnel, can improve chromaticity correction in CCX and CCY but limited by synchrotron radiation Optimization of the space between QF1 and QD0 for the chromaticity minimization FFS design : FFS tuning : Reduce FD magnetic peak field especially for QF1 (currently > 3 T) Weights optimization with realistic errors condition for ILC (initial misalignment, BPM resolution…)
14
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire Soutenance AERO 5 CSS 06/11/2014 Conclusions slide 14/14 5 5 The space between QF1 and QD0 has a significant impact on final beam sizes at the maximum order considered: need to be more investigate Summary and Conclusions Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire 2 2 3 3 Objectives & Strategy European Organization for Nuclear Research ILC BDS MEETING 04/12/2014 4 4 Conclusions 5 5 1 1 With less optimistic tuning set up (200 μm initial transverse misalignment and 100nm BPM resolution) the tuning performance drop
Présentations similaires
© 2024 SlidePlayer.fr Inc.
All rights reserved.